Part:BBa_K4165173
Biobrick GST - CoH2 - Linker - WWW
This composite part consists of T7 promoter (BBa_K3633015), lac operator (BBa_K4165062), RBS 4 (BBa_K4165264), GST (BBa_K4165070), CoH2 (BBa_K4165003), GGGGSx3 (BBa_K4165068), WWW (BBa_K4165007), and T7 terminator (BBa_K731721).
Usage and Biology
The protac in our snitch system is responsible for connecting the target protein (tau) to the Trim21 which binds to E2 conjugating enzymes and put tau and ubiquitin in proximity to each other resulting in ubiquitination of the tau at lysine residue and after ubiquitination the tau will be degraded by 26S proteasome.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 45
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 189
Dry Lab
Modeling
From 3 models out of 16 Models modeled in 4 software, 1 Model ranked best according to its Q_Mean values 4 and 6. The best Model has values of :
cbeta_deviations | clashscore | molprobity | ramachandran_favored | ramachandran_outliers | Qmean_4 | Qmean_6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.08 | 1.35 | 96.31 | 0.79 | -0.01 | -0.29 |
Figure 1. The 3D structure of the COH-Linker-WWW model Displayed on Pymol.
Mathematical modeling
Transcription rate and translation rate under T7 promotor
the mathematical modeling was based on our code for the calculation of transcription and translation (you can find it in the code section) beside with the estimated results from the wet lab.
Figure 2. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time compared with the wet lab results.
WetLab Results
Comparison between the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator and chemical lysis
We have made a statistical analysis (t-test) to investigate the mathematical model's effectiveness in predicting the amount of the produced protein due to IPTG induction, whereas the test compares the mathematical model expected results to the replicates made in the induction experiment, given that all the condition of the experiment has been input to the model generating the predicted results
Figure 3. This graph shows that the mathematical model of the dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator correlate with each other
Figure 4. This Graph shows the mathematical model of the dry lab and the results of the wet lab of GST COH WWW using chemical lysis don't correlate with each other as there is a great difference between the results, as the P-value is found to be <0.0001
None |